Oh my …………… I won’t type what came into my head (my catholic friend wouldn’t like to hear that) but seriously… I am going to type to get over the annoyance at the idea that risks need to be viewed as ball-bearings falling from the sky!!!!!!!!
That way of accessing risks is so ridiculous.
Wherever I worked, there was always risk and in the big businesses there were risk assessments and steps taken to reduce risks of injury. What was clear was that injuries happened almost exclusively when several things went wrong at the same time.
E.g. One factory had a lot of steel beams about head height so there was a strict rule to keep hard hats on… One hot day, a man took his hat off and then, unusually had to rush, effectively walking taller than he usually did and collided with a steel beam.
When it comes to health risks, it depends on lifestyle and the state of our immune system (some would say, “Forget immune system – it just whether or not we have kept ourselves generally healthy”). Choosing to eat real food, to be outdoors for a while every day and in bed most of the night are usually good lifestyle choices. Choosing junk food, not getting up before noon and being on phone until 2am are usually poor lifestyle choices.
Whether or not we end up in hospital is not like getting hit by a ball-bearing from the sky. It is not (NOT!) down to ‘luck’ the way this article suggests. I highly recommend, “The Luck Factor” by Richard Wiseman‘. Basically, after 10 years of study he concluded people create ‘luck’ by the choices they make. (Click on the link to find 4 ways people create GOOD LUCK)
It is almost entirely the frail people who are going into hospital. The only reason there’s more old people going into hospital is not because they are old but because so many old people are frail.
Example: My mother is almost 90 years old, eats mainly real food and takes some high quality supplements and less prescription drugs than her friends. She has not been a patient in hospital for more than a few hours in about 60 years.
After saying risks are like ball-bearings falling from the sky there is, “The fact that more vaccinated people are dying than unvaccinated people does nothing to undermine vaccine safety or effectiveness.” I recommend you read that again and let it sink in.
This argument is kind of reasonable until we examine the numbers dying IN EACH AGE GROUP and do this week-after-week. The evidence has continued to build that shows, in general, regardless of age, those who are C-injected tend to die sooner. Now, even this does not prove the C-injections are shortening lives. Why? Because those who choose not to have injections often do so because they have adopted a healthy lifestyle and have already had several bouts corona-virus-type infections in recent years that have further boosted their immunity.
Immunity acquired from an infection has been shown to be far better and far more long-lasting than immunity through injection. [ For the best immunity: inFection beats inJection. ]
If risks were really anything like ball-bearings falling from the sky there would be a wide range of options beyond putting sieves in the sky, and as it say in that article, “a second sieve underneath the first”! One could; move to a place that does not rain ball-bearings, stay under-cover, don’t go out in the rain…
If it were not so serious we could laugh at the idea only an INJection can provide PROTection.
I am not recommending the article. For completeness here is the link:
